<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ProAirman.com &#187; faa</title>
	<atom:link href="http://proairman.com/tag/faa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://proairman.com</link>
	<description>~ making a difference in aviation safety</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:50:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Your SMS doesn’t meet the ICAO Standard</title>
		<link>http://proairman.com/your-sms-doesn%e2%80%99t-meet-the-icao-standard/</link>
		<comments>http://proairman.com/your-sms-doesn%e2%80%99t-meet-the-icao-standard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 00:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ProAirman.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General SMS Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annex 6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annex 6 Part II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annex 6 Section III]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Aviation Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Business Aviation Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IS-BAO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[not by its self anyway.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety management system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMS processes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your SMS does not meet the Standard specified in ICAO Annex 6]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proairman.com/?p=677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your SMS does not meet the Standard specified in ICAO Annex 6, Part II.  Well, not by its self anyway. Ok, admittedly overstated, sorry. My reason for the attention-getting statement is that many operators are under the misconception that the only requirement they need to meet is to implement an SMS.  There are more requirements, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://proairman.com/your-sms-doesn%e2%80%99t-meet-the-icao-standard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IS-BAO 8.14 – Flight Data Recorders and Cockpit Voice Recorders</title>
		<link>http://proairman.com/is-bao-flight-data-recorder-requirement/</link>
		<comments>http://proairman.com/is-bao-flight-data-recorder-requirement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 19:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ProAirman.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IS-BAO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annex 6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annex 6 Part II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Aviation Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Business Aviation Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety management system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proairman.com/?p=566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent post on the NBAA AirMail forum an operator questioned the discovery, during an IS-BAO audit, of the requirement for a flight data recorder (FDR) to be installed on their aircraft. The individual did not provide information, regarding aircraft type or age, so it is not possible to address the FDR requirements specifically for this operator.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://proairman.com/is-bao-flight-data-recorder-requirement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Understanding the Safety Management System – Part 6</title>
		<link>http://proairman.com/its-more-than-an-sms/</link>
		<comments>http://proairman.com/its-more-than-an-sms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ProAirman.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Understanding the SMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annex 6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annex 6 Part II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annex 6 Section III]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Business Aviation Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Committee for Standardization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Aviation Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Accountability Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IS-BAO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulatory changes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety assurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety management system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMS processes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proairman.com/?p=419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The SMS is the cornerstone of the IS-BAO. It incorporates all if the applicable provisions of ICAO Annex 6, which means the IS-BAO registered operators meet the ICAO requirement.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://proairman.com/its-more-than-an-sms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Follow-up on FAA SMS ANPRM</title>
		<link>http://proairman.com/follow-up-on-faa-sms-anprm/</link>
		<comments>http://proairman.com/follow-up-on-faa-sms-anprm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 17:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ProAirman.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advance notice of proposed rulemaking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Aviation Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulatory changes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety management system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proairman.com/?p=413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Follow-up on the FAA’s proposal for Safety Management Systems [Docket No. FAA–2009–0671; Notice No. 09–06].]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://proairman.com/follow-up-on-faa-sms-anprm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Understanding the SMS – Part 5</title>
		<link>http://proairman.com/industry-sponsored-alternative-for-sms-compliance/</link>
		<comments>http://proairman.com/industry-sponsored-alternative-for-sms-compliance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 19:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ProAirman.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Understanding the SMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annex 6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aviation Rulemaking Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Business Aviation Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Committee for Standardization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Aviation Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Business Aviation Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IS-BAO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulatory changes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rulemaking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety management system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMS processes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proairman.com/?p=377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fact that many States have already implemented the requirement for an SMS is being overlooked.  For example; Canada currently requires an SMS for private aircraft operators, via the Private Operator Certificate (POC).]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://proairman.com/industry-sponsored-alternative-for-sms-compliance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Understanding the SMS &#8211; Part 4</title>
		<link>http://proairman.com/understanding-the-sms-part-4/</link>
		<comments>http://proairman.com/understanding-the-sms-part-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 04:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ProAirman.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Understanding the SMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annex 6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annex 6 Part II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annex 6 Section III]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Aviation Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety management system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proairman.com/?p=310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Conundrum for Operators - The States, such as the U.S., that do not have a requirement for operators to implement an SMS, leave operators in a bit of a pickle when it comes to International operations.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://proairman.com/understanding-the-sms-part-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GAO Reports on the Pilot Age Standard</title>
		<link>http://proairman.com/gao-reports-on-the-pilot-age-standard/</link>
		<comments>http://proairman.com/gao-reports-on-the-pilot-age-standard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ProAirman.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accident rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[age 60]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[age 65]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Treatment for Experienced Pilots Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Aviation Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GAO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Accountability Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NTSB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulatory changes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rulemaking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proairman.com/?p=272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) reports on the safety effect of the Fair Treatment for Experienced Pilots Act (age 65).]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://proairman.com/gao-reports-on-the-pilot-age-standard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FAA Proposes Safety Management Systems</title>
		<link>http://proairman.com/faa-proposes-safety-management-systems/</link>
		<comments>http://proairman.com/faa-proposes-safety-management-systems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ProAirman.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advance notice of proposed rulemaking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annex 6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annex 6 Part II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annex 6 Section III]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anprm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ARC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aviation Rulemaking Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[certificate holders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notice of proposed rulemaking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nprm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[part 119]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[part 121]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[part 125]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[part 135]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[part 141]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[part 142]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[part 145]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[part 21]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulatory changes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rulemaking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety management system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proairman.com/?p=168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FAA published an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) that would require certain part 21, 119, 121, 125, 135, 141, 142, and 145 certificate holders, product manufacturers, applicants, and employers to develop a Safety Management System.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://proairman.com/faa-proposes-safety-management-systems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

