<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ProAirman.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://proairman.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://proairman.com</link>
	<description>~ making a difference in aviation safety</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 01:38:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>IS-BAO 8.14 – Flight Data Recorders and Cockpit Voice Recorders</title>
		<link>http://proairman.com/is-bao-flight-data-recorder-requirement/</link>
		<comments>http://proairman.com/is-bao-flight-data-recorder-requirement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 19:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ProAirman.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IS-BAO Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annex 6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annex 6 Part II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Aviation Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Business Aviation Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IS-BAO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety management system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proairman.com/?p=566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent post on the NBAA AirMail forum an operator questioned the discovery, during an IS-BAO audit, of the requirement for a flight data recorder (FDR) to be installed on their aircraft. The individual did not provide information, regarding aircraft type or age, so it is not possible to address the FDR requirements specifically for this operator.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://proairman.com/is-bao-flight-data-recorder-requirement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transport Canada takes back oversight of the POC.</title>
		<link>http://proairman.com/transport-canada-takes-back-oversight-of-the-poc/</link>
		<comments>http://proairman.com/transport-canada-takes-back-oversight-of-the-poc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ProAirman.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Operator Certificate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transport Canada]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proairman.com/?p=560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On March 16, 2010 Canada’s Transport Minister, John Baird, announced that Transport Canada will take back the certification and oversight functions for business aviation from the Canadian Business Aviation Association (CBAA).]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://proairman.com/transport-canada-takes-back-oversight-of-the-poc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Closer Look at the Aviation Safety Management System – Part 3</title>
		<link>http://proairman.com/a-closer-look-at-the-aviation-safety-management-system/</link>
		<comments>http://proairman.com/a-closer-look-at-the-aviation-safety-management-system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ProAirman.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A Closer Look at the SMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canned SMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[check the box]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Measurable Performance Objectives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[off-the-shelf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organizational Controls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oversight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety assurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety management system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMS processes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proairman.com/?p=547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The previous article, “The Shifting Focus of Safety Management,” made reference to the requirement for a performance based approach to safety management. This article discusses organizational controls, measurable performance, and compliance approach vs. performance approach to safety management.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://proairman.com/a-closer-look-at-the-aviation-safety-management-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Closer Look at the Aviation Safety Management System – Part 2</title>
		<link>http://proairman.com/shifting-focus-of-safety-management/</link>
		<comments>http://proairman.com/shifting-focus-of-safety-management/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 01:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ProAirman.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A Closer Look at the SMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automation management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crew resource management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human factors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human performance factors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[line-oriented flight training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LOFT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organizational factors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety assurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety management system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proairman.com/?p=525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The modern approach to safety management moves away from the human factors (who did it) and address the organization factors (why it happened).]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://proairman.com/shifting-focus-of-safety-management/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is an SMS required in Canada for U.S. Part 91 Operators?</title>
		<link>http://proairman.com/is-an-sms-required-in-canada-for-u-s-part-91-operators/</link>
		<comments>http://proairman.com/is-an-sms-required-in-canada-for-u-s-part-91-operators/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 00:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ProAirman.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Heat Of The Moment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Convention on International Civil Aviation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAR Part 91]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAO Doc 7300/9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety management system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transport Canada]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proairman.com/?p=513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is an SMS required in Canada for U.S. Part 91 Operators? Read the email from Transport Canada.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://proairman.com/is-an-sms-required-in-canada-for-u-s-part-91-operators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NTSB Amends Notification Requirements</title>
		<link>http://proairman.com/ntsb-amends-notification-requirements/</link>
		<comments>http://proairman.com/ntsb-amends-notification-requirements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ProAirman.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advance notice of proposed rulemaking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NTSB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NTSB Section 830]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R/A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resolution Advisory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TCAS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proairman.com/?p=504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NTSB is amending its regulations, effective March 8 2010, concerning notification and reporting requirements regarding aircraft accidents or incidents.  This amendment includes notification of TCAS resolution advisories when operating on an IFR flight plan or in class A Airspace.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://proairman.com/ntsb-amends-notification-requirements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Closer Look at the Aviation Safety Management System – Part 1</title>
		<link>http://proairman.com/review-what-we-have-learned/</link>
		<comments>http://proairman.com/review-what-we-have-learned/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 22:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ProAirman.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[A Closer Look at the SMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety management system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMS processes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMS toolbox]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proairman.com/?p=478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ICAO deadline has been the focus.  The fact that some States have already implemented the requirement for an SMS is being overlooked. For example; Canada currently requires an SMS for private aircraft operators of turbine-powered pressurized airplanes. (CAR 604)]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://proairman.com/review-what-we-have-learned/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Understanding the Safety Management System &#8211; Part 7</title>
		<link>http://proairman.com/do-you-need-an-sms/</link>
		<comments>http://proairman.com/do-you-need-an-sms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 22:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ProAirman.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Understanding the SMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety management system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proairman.com/?p=455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many operators are hung up on ICAO dates for determining when or if they need an SMS. The primary factor in determining the requirements for an SMS is the regulatory requirement of your country of registration and your area of operation.  See our decision flowchart to determine if you need an SMS.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://proairman.com/do-you-need-an-sms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Understanding the Safety Management System – Part 6</title>
		<link>http://proairman.com/its-more-than-an-sms/</link>
		<comments>http://proairman.com/its-more-than-an-sms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ProAirman.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Understanding the SMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annex 6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annex 6 Part II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annex 6 Section III]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EASA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Business Aviation Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Committee for Standardization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Aviation Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Accountability Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICAO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IS-BAO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulatory changes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety assurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety management system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMS processes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proairman.com/?p=419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The SMS is the cornerstone of the IS-BAO. It incorporates all if the applicable provisions of ICAO Annex 6, which means the IS-BAO registered operators meet the ICAO requirement.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://proairman.com/its-more-than-an-sms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Follow-up on FAA SMS ANPRM</title>
		<link>http://proairman.com/follow-up-on-faa-sms-anprm/</link>
		<comments>http://proairman.com/follow-up-on-faa-sms-anprm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 17:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ProAirman.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advance notice of proposed rulemaking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Aviation Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulatory changes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety management system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://proairman.com/?p=413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Follow-up on the FAA’s proposal for Safety Management Systems [Docket No. FAA–2009–0671; Notice No. 09–06].]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://proairman.com/follow-up-on-faa-sms-anprm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
